Home > Forum > FMCSA Meeting

FMCSA Meeting

May 04, 2026 at 03:03 PM CST
+ 10

Hey Members,

I’ve recently been contacted by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). They’ve been following our content and want to learn more about bulk trucking… and more importantly, the real issues you all are facing out on the road every day.

They’ve invited me to come to Washington to sit down and have that conversation.

I’ll be honest… I may be opening a can of worms here....
But that’s exactly why I’m coming to you.

If I’m going to represent this industry, I want it to come straight from the people living it.

I’ve always felt like bulk trucking and agriculture haven’t had the level of representation they deserve. There’s been attention on general freight, but not enough focus on what makes our space different.

This is an opportunity to change that… and I want to take it seriously.

So I’d love your help:
👉 What are the biggest challenges you’re facing today?
👉 What frustrations do you have with regulations or enforcement?
👉 What would actually make your job easier out there?
👉 If you had 10 minutes with the FMCSA, what would you say?

Drop your thoughts below or message me directly if you’d rather keep it private. [email protected]

I’m honored for the opportunity, but I’m only doing this because of you all and for this industry we care about.

God bless,

Jared

Replied on Tue, May 05, 2026 at 07:56 AM CST

I would love to be a fly on the wall in that meeting!

As a small fleet operator in Central Texas specializing in aggregate and livestock, I believe the most critical issue facing our regional industry is the lack of accountability regarding 'papertagged' vehicles. Despite recent state laws targeting temporary tags and English language proficiency, the reality on the ground remains unchanged. These violators are still printing unauthorized tags and heading straight to gravel pits to get loaded.

Currently, brokerages with no vested interest in our industry’s health are dispatching these illegal, uninsured carriers by the hundreds. While commercial vehicle enforcement officers are doing what they can, they cannot solve this alone. We need to shift the focus toward holding shippers and receivers accountable for the carriers they allow on their sites. If the parties hiring these trucks faced consequences for utilizing uninsured or non-compliant vehicles, we would see an immediate improvement in market rates and a significant reduction in road accidents. I urge the association to advocate for shared responsibility throughout the supply chain to protect legitimate Texas operators.

Replied on Tue, May 05, 2026 at 07:58 AM CST
+ 3

RE: FMCSA Meeting – Bulk Liquid / Chemical Carrier Reality

Jared,

Respect for stepping into this with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

I’ll keep this direct:

Drivers and carriers are strictly regulated and immediately enforced.
Brokers are loosely regulated and rarely enforced. That imbalance is where many of these problems begin.

1. Transparency Exists on Paper—Not in Practice

Under 49 CFR § 371.3, carriers should be able to see transaction details.

In reality:

  • That right is waived in contracts
  • Requests are ignored or delayed
  • Carriers negotiate without knowing true rates

2. Bulk & Chemical Hauling Is Specialized—and Expensive

This is not general freight.

We operate in:

  • Refineries
  • Chemical plants
  • Terminals

With:

  • Hazmat compliance
  • High insurance costs
  • Strict facility requirements
  • Time-sensitive, production-critical loads

The cost to operate in this space is high—and the compensation does not reflect that.

3. Rates, Accessorials, and Pay Are Not Standardized

There is no consistency on:

  • Detention
  • Layover
  • Storage
  • Hazmat differential

Rates change load-to-load—even with the same broker.

4. The Result

  • Carriers absorb the risk
  • Drivers are underpaid
  • Payments are delayed or reduced
  • Small carriers are being pushed out

5. What Needs to Happen

  • Enforce existing transparency rules
  • Stop contract waivers of federal protections
  • Standardize accessorial pay structures
  • Address enforcement imbalance between brokers and carriers
  • Recognize bulk/chemical as a distinct, high-cost sector

Bottom line:

Carriers are not asking for more—they’re asking to be paid fairly for specialized, high-cost work in a system that currently lacks balance and enforcement.

Appreciate you bringing this forward.

Replied on Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:05 AM CST
Quote: "I would love to be a fly on the wall in that meeting! As a small fleet operator in Central Texas specializing in aggregate and livestock, I believe the most critical issue facing our regional industry is the lack of accountability regarding 'papertagged' vehicles. Despite recent state laws targeting temporary tags and English language proficiency, the reality on the ground remains unchanged. These violators are still printing unauthorized tags and heading straight to gravel pits to get loaded. Currently, brokerages with no vested interest in our industry’s health are dispatching these illegal, uninsured carriers by the hundreds. While commercial vehicle enforcement officers are doing what they can, they cannot solve this alone. We need to shift the focus toward holding shippers and receivers accountable for the carriers they allow on their sites. If the parties hiring these trucks faced consequences for utilizing uninsured or non-compliant vehicles, we would see an immediate improvement in market rates and a significant reduction in road accidents. I urge the association to advocate for shared responsibility throughout the supply chain to protect legitimate Texas operators. "

Hey Michael,

Thank you for taking the time to send this over. As I start bringing these topics up while I’m up there, I agree with you. There has definitely been progress made, but there’s still a lot of room for improvement, especially when it comes to the legal setup process for carriers.

That said, it does seem like we’re starting to see some progress in holding shippers and brokers more accountable for the carriers they hire to haul their freight.

I appreciate you sharing this. Please keep the feedback coming.

Replied on Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:08 AM CST
+ 1
Quote: "RE: FMCSA Meeting – Bulk Liquid / Chemical Carrier Reality Jared, Respect for stepping into this with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. I’ll keep this direct: Drivers and carriers are strictly regulated and immediately enforced.Brokers are loosely regulated and rarely enforced. That imbalance is where many of these problems begin. 1. Transparency Exists on Paper—Not in Practice Under 49 CFR § 371.3, carriers should be able to see transaction details. In reality: That right is waived in contracts Requests are ignored or delayed Carriers negotiate without knowing true rates 2. Bulk & Chemical Hauling Is Specialized—and Expensive This is not general freight. We operate in: Refineries Chemical plants Terminals With: Hazmat compliance High insurance costs Strict facility requirements Time-sensitive, production-critical loads The cost to operate in this space is high—and the compensation does not reflect that. 3. Rates, Accessorials, and Pay Are Not Standardized There is no consistency on: Detention Layover Storage Hazmat differential Rates change load-to-load—even with the same broker. 4. The Result Carriers absorb the risk Drivers are underpaid Payments are delayed or reduced Small carriers are being pushed out 5. What Needs to Happen Enforce existing transparency rules Stop contract waivers of federal protections Standardize accessorial pay structures Address enforcement imbalance between brokers and carriers Recognize bulk/chemical as a distinct, high-cost sector Bottom line: Carriers are not asking for more—they’re asking to be paid fairly for specialized, high-cost work in a system that currently lacks balance and enforcement. Appreciate you bringing this forward."

I appreciate that. I really feel like this is the next step for me, making sure you all have a voice, especially those who haven’t been represented in Washington. I know it’s a long road, but I do believe progress can be made for small-town America and owner-operators who often get overlooked.

One thing that keeps coming up is the amount of hidden costs that never get recognized on the other side, especially detention. Most carriers are paid by the load, not by the hour, and that creates a real challenge when time gets eaten up sitting and waiting.

I understand there are always multiple sides to every situation, but what I keep seeing is just how tight margins really are. Too often, those costs end up falling back on the carriers, and that’s something that needs more attention.

Replied on Wed, May 06, 2026 at 02:10 PM CST
+ 1
Too many people in truckers pockets and too much percentage being taken by brokers and too many loads being double and triple brokered. Also brokers don’t have aclue what expenses there are to truck owners. Insurance is too expensive and seems to benefit older larger company’s more than the little guy starting out. There are different laws permits requirements for different states that cause stress frustration and confusion. Then the scale houses and laws need to be unified. There’s major problems when scale houses in the same state will tell you different things regarding the law fines and regulations, so your up a creek without a paddle even if you think you’ve asked the right question and done the right things.
Replied on Thu, May 07, 2026 at 09:07 AM CST

When is this going to happen Jared?

Replied on Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:12 AM CST

Respectfully, the issues brought by some, broker transparency etc. are commerce issues. It is the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration. I'm sorry. This bugs the hell out of me.

Replied on Mon, May 11, 2026 at 09:12 AM CST
Quote: "Too many people in truckers pockets and too much percentage being taken by brokers and too many loads being double and triple brokered. Also brokers don’t have aclue what expenses there are to truck owners. Insurance is too expensive and seems to benefit older larger company’s more than the little guy starting out. There are different laws permits requirements for different states that cause stress frustration and confusion. Then the scale houses and laws need to be unified. There’s major problems when scale houses in the same state will tell you different things regarding the law fines and regulations, so your up a creek without a paddle even if you think you’ve asked the right question and done the right things."

Hey Bernard, thank you for the comments. I agree. One thing I’m really trying to focus on is how we can unify states more, especially when it comes to scale houses and regulations. These guys are limited on where they can go, not just because of weights, but because every state seems to have different rules and enforcement. It definitely hurts when you’re moving commodities across multiple states and trying to operate efficiently.

Again, that’s one of the goals I discussed with the FMCSA, figuring out how we can make this better for carriers moving into 2026. Right now, in a lot of ways, it still feels like the Wild West.

Replied on Mon, May 11, 2026 at 09:12 AM CST
Quote: "When is this going to happen Jared?"

Paul - we are planning in the middle of June. Would love your feedback. Passed by your operation just last week and thought about you.

Replied on Mon, May 11, 2026 at 09:16 AM CST
Quote: "Respectfully, the issues brought by some, broker transparency etc. are commerce issues. It is the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration. I'm sorry. This bugs the hell out of me."

Hey Dean!

Again, this is a start. They’re ultimately responsible for safety on our roadways for everyone. But as government has expanded over the years, there are now multiple agencies, departments, and regulations all tied into trucking. The challenge for carriers, especially small fleets and owner-operators, is that it can feel disconnected and inconsistent from state to state and agency to agency.

The goal isn’t to point fingers. The goal is to figure out how we bring more unity, clarity, and common sense together in a way that still protects safety, but also makes it easier for good carriers to operate and stay compliant. Right now, too many trucking companies spend more time navigating red tape than focusing on safely and efficiently moving freight.

Again, this is just the beginning of the conversation, but I’m thankful they’re willing to listen and hear directly from the people actually living it every day out on the road.

Replied on Thu, May 14, 2026 at 07:59 AM CST
+ 1
Hello Jared. Something the comes to the forefront of my mind being an owner/operator pulling a hopper is the need for some real leniency when it comes to axle weights and bulk haulers. It’s not an exact science and these loads shift as we travel. This would be some real common sense reform for us as an industry!!!